- Stevens Institute of Technology
- Pay to Play
- Content Research Area
- Quality of Life Issues
- OPRA (Open Public Records Act)
- Bribes, Payoffs, and Politics
- Letters to the Editor
- Voter Information
- OPMA (Open Public Meetings Act)
- FREE SPEECH and INTERNET ISSUES
- Eminent Domain
- Governor Corzine
- Lawsuits and Legal Actions
- Hoboken News
- Health Issues
- Employment Opportunities
- Regionalize and Shared Services
- Investigations (Restricted Access)
- Public Official Report Card
- Political Commentary
- Payments In Lieu of Taxes
- Consumer Issues
- Affordable Housing
- 2006 N.J. U.S. Senate Race
- U.S. Senator Robert Menendez
- Homeland Security
- NJ NY Port Authority
- R.I.C.O. Act
- Editorials - New Jersey Newspapers
- POG - People for OPen Government
- Investigative Agencies
- Hoboken City Council Video
- Presidential Election 2008
- Investigative Report
- Area Event Calendar
- Presedential electiom 2008
- New Jersey League of Municipalities
- NJ State Court System
- National Politics
- Social Interaction
- Shrink for Men
- Governor Chris Christie
- Tenant Rights
- NJ League of Municipalities
- NYC GROUND ZERO
- Political Figures
- Health Care
- Hoboken Lawsuits
- Featured News
- IRS TAX RELIEF
- Federal Budget
- Healthcare Fraud
- New Jersey For Profit Hospitals
- Hudson County Emergency Medical Services
Court revokes right to tape official forums
- Categorized in: Lawsuits and Legal Actions
Town council visitor loses suit
Thursday, November 24, 2005
Taking back a right the public has had for 21 years, a state appeals court ruled yesterday the New Jersey Constitution does not protect citizens who videotape open government meetings.
The three-judge court unanimously dismissed a lawsuit by a Camden County man who claimed he was wrongfully arrested for attempting to videotape two borough council meetings in September 2000.
In doing so, the court eviscerated a 1984 appeals court ruling that gave citizens -- in that case, the members of a teachers union -- "the right to videotape the proceedings of the (school) board."
Robert Wayne Tarus said yesterday he was aware of that ruling when he brought his video camera to a meeting of the Pine Hill Borough Council. He said he had seen council members change their stories and wanted an accurate record of their comments.
According to the appellate ruling, Mayor Leslie Gallagher "polled those present and found that several members of the audience did not wish to be videotaped." She repeatedly told Tarus to turn off his camera and he replied they would have to arrest him, which the police chief did, according to the ruling.
The same scenario was repeated a month later and again Tarus was arrested, according to the opinion. After he was acquitted of disorderly conduct, Tarus filed a federal lawsuit, which was dismissed, and then a lawsuit in state court.
Dismissing that lawsuit yesterday, Appellate Division Judge Anthony Parrillo ruled the state constitution protects the right of the public to attend public meetings, not to videotape the proceedings.
"Thus, the right to videotape public proceedings is subject to reasonable governmental restrictions," Parrillo wrote. He characterized Gallagher's order to stop videotaping as "simply an ad hoc means of regulating the manner in which videotaping would occur."
In October 1982, members of the Maurice River Township Teachers Association were told to stop videotaping a school board meeting. After state troopers failed to resolve the dispute, the board members walked out and filed a lawsuit to block the teachers from taping.
Two courts sided with the teachers. A trial judge found citizens have a right to videotape open meetings of governmental bodies and ordered the school board to permit it. A three-judge appeals court upheld that order, adding that video cameras had become so common as security devices that there was no valid argument for banishing them from public meetings.
Yesterday, Parrillo said "no violation of state law" occurred when Tarus was ordered to stop videotaping. Judges John Holston Jr. and William Gilroy joined Parrillo's ruling.
Mine Hill's new mayor, Fred Constantino, said the appeals court ruling "validates the borough's position."
Tarus' lawyer, Thomas Bruno, said he is considering asking the New Jersey Supreme Court to review the case.
New comments are currently disabled.
Email to Friend
Fill in the form below to send this article to a friend:
- HAS PREDATORY HEALTH CARE LENDING COME TO HOBOKEN?
- The Emotionally Abusive Personality: Is She a Borderline or a Narcissist?
- Withholding Sex as a Form of Punishment
- Don't Marry Essay. Why Marriage Has Become a Raw Deal for Men
- NJ Business Facts
- What the Parking/Transportation industry is saying about Hoboken's Automated Garage
- You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig
- Hoboken Board of Education
Recent Employment Opportunities
- Technology Consultant - City of Hoboken
- Finance Director City of Hoboken
- ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR
- Civil Service Commission Seeks Entry-Level Firefighter Applicants Applications for the entry-level Firefighter Test will be accepted for 70 municipalities and other local jurisdictions
- Senior Accountant: Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ
- City of Hoboken - Fire Department Audit
- Hoboken: ZONING OFFICER